CertiFlow

The Hidden Traps of Self‑Insured 1095‑C Reporting

Self-insured coverage adds a second ACA reporting duty that has nothing to do with full-time status — and software built only for the employer mandate misses it entirely.

Form 1095‑C Part III  ·  Code 1G  ·  Self-insured plans

If your company self-insures, an employee who was never full-time will still need a complete 1095‑C if they were enrolled in that self-insured coverage (instructions, pg 2). Not a 1095‑B, but the full C form, with a specific code, filled out a specific way. Most ACA software misses this because it’s built to answer one question — did you offer coverage to full-time employees — and self-insurance quietly adds a second one that doesn’t care about full-time status at all.

Two different jobs on one form

A 1095‑C has a primary job. Parts I and II answer the employer-mandate question under §4980H: did this ALE offer affordable, minimum-value coverage to this full-time employee, month by month. That’s the part everyone knows.

Self-insured employers have a second, unrelated job: report everyone who was actually covered. Normally that’s the insurance carrier’s job, done separately on Form 1095‑B. But with self-insurance, the employer is the coverage provider, and that duty lands on Part III of the same 1095‑C instead of a standalone form.

Part III doesn’t ask about full-time status (instructions, pg 16). It asks who had coverage, and in which months — full-time, part-time, variable-hour, or in some cases, not an employee at all.

The rule that catches people

The consequence: an employee who was never full-time — someone who, under Part II alone, would never generate a 1095‑C at all — still needs one if they enrolled in the self-insured plan. Their form carries no ordinary employer-mandate offer codes. Line 14 uses code 1G for the entire year, and Part III lists everyone the coverage actually covered: the employee, plus any spouse or dependents also enrolled.

Miss this, and the employer hasn’t failed to offer coverage — they’ve failed to report coverage they actually provided. That’s its own, separate compliance gap, easy to have with an otherwise-perfect employer-mandate filing.

Where 1G trips people up

Why this gets missed

Most ACA tooling is built around the Part II employer-mandate question, because that’s the headline compliance concern and the one tied to the big ESRP penalties. Full-time tracking becomes the trigger for "does this person need a form" — which is correct for Part II and silently wrong for Part III, because the self-insured trigger doesn’t check full-time status at all. A system built to ask only one question will never ask the other.